Home › Blog
Captions are the edit most videos need
Most video is watched muted, in feeds, by people deciding in two seconds whether to stay. Captions are not an accessibility afterthought — they are the edit that makes the other edits matter. And AI finally made them cheap enough to stop skipping.
The muted majority
Feed video starts silent. A viewer scrolling past gives an uncaptioned video almost nothing to hold on to — no words to catch the eye, no sentence to get curious about. Captioned video speaks before it is heard, which in a feed is the only speaking there is. Creators feel this as retention; it is really just legibility.
The same captions carry the video for everyone the audio fails: noisy trains, sleeping households, second-language viewers, and the hearing-impaired audience captions were originally built for. One edit, every audience.
Why now and not before
Hand-typing captions costs roughly an hour per ten minutes of video, which is why they were skipped. Machine transcription flipped the economics: the draft writes itself in minutes, timed to the speech, and the human job shrinks to proof-reading the lines that matter — names, numbers, the punchline.
The honest caveat: machine ears stumble on noise, crosstalk and rare words. The workflow that works is AI draft plus human skim, which still lands at a tenth of the old cost.
Burned in or sidecar
For social platforms, burn captions into the picture: every player shows them, muted autoplay included. For hosted video, a caption file (SRT or VTT) keeps them switchable and searchable. The edit is the same; only the packaging differs — choose by where the video will live.